Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 10, Issue 166
Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 10, Issue 166
- Subject: Re: Colorsync-users Digest, Vol 10, Issue 166
- From: Spinnaker Photo Imaging Center <email@hidden>
- Date: Sat, 03 Aug 2013 13:47:56 -0700
Mark Bergsma of Bellingham, WA, still uses his Epson Pro 10000.
I forwarded you comment to Mark. The issue with 10000 if I remember, is couldn't get reds.
On Aug 3, 2013, at 1:26 PM, Martin Orpen <email@hidden> wrote:
> On 3 Aug 2013, at 19:41, "Millers' Photography L.L.C." <email@hidden> wrote:
>
>> What a tremendous difference. 9900 is nearly miraculous.
>
> It is an incredible printing deviceā¦
>
> Until you compare prints that you may have made on an Epson 10000 a decade ago and you realise that the Ultrachrome MK ink is a major step backwards in print quality.
>
> There is no *comparison* in fact.
>
> Any print that relies for its impact on dense, velvet blacks would look better printed on Epson's ancient ink jet tech than on any of its current range.
>
> --
> Martin Orpen
> Idea Digital Imaging Ltd
> _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
> This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden