Re: icc profile question..
Re: icc profile question..
- Subject: Re: icc profile question..
- From: Steve Upton <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 13:21:25 -0700
On Mar 25, 2013, at 12:31 PM, Scott Martin <email@hidden> wrote:
> On Mar 25, 2013, at 1:38 PM, Tyler Boley <email@hidden> wrote:
>
>> but the B to A tables, used for actual printing and converting, remain large. What am I missing?
>
>
> You're right Tyler, the A to B table is mostly used for soft proofing and setting i1Profiler to "small" for this does save file size without any noticeable difference in print and soft proofing quality, at lest from my testing.
>
> And despite the fact that they won't listen to me about it, the CXF data does often trigger something in Photoshop that prevents the profiles from showing up in their list. I've been saving without CXF data ever since and they always show up - a good trick! Wish I could get Adobe to admit they have a problem here…
Also, the A to B tables tend to be quite large due to their multi-channel nature.
For B to A, the tables have gridRes ^ 3 entries, each 12 bytes in size (6 channels x 16 bit precision)
For B to A, the tables have gridRes ^ 6 entries, each 6 bytes in size… so they can get rather big….
regards,
Steve
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden