Re: SWOPv2 is dead
Re: SWOPv2 is dead
- Subject: Re: SWOPv2 is dead
- From: Andrew Rodney <email@hidden>
- Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2015 11:02:29 -0700
> On Feb 28, 2015, at 10:15 AM, G Mike Adams <email@hidden> wrote:
>
> Actually, I think the arguments on this have been made and remade here to the point that the horseflesh is getting a little putrid, but I will just go ahead and say that my problem with this argument is that it's self-defeating.
Absolutely so, but some foks who will remain nameless have to keep the email's flying while providing zero useful information about the subject of color to fan unnecessary flames. I suggest they find another list that doesn't include the topic of color and bitch and moan about the subscription model, or something else.
> If a user is "sophisticated with color management", how would a default setting they can easily change be such a constraint?
Stupid or severely un-educated users of Photoshop (or it seems anything to do with color) are apparently not the issue, it's that evil company Adobe's fault. Adobe should build products designed to be idiot proof so only idiots can and will use it seems to be the message from some here who should know better and concentrate their time educating their own customers for THEIR color issues. But that's work. Easier to blame Adobe for the color ill's of the world.
It just has to be Adobe's falult that the ignorant masses who can't pick the correct profile for CMYK conversions also can't figure out the color of the TS's dress!
http://www.buzzfeed.com/lyapalater/taylor-swift-has-spoken-and-says-the-dress-is-black-and-blue#.vyNLRrGZG
Andrew Rodney
http://www.digitaldog.net/
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden