RE: SWOPv2 is dead
RE: SWOPv2 is dead
- Subject: RE: SWOPv2 is dead
- From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>
- Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2015 13:12:59 -0500
That bad, Martin? Where did this GRACoL profile came from?
I always use ColorToolbox to make GRACoL profiles.
Best / Roger
-----Original Message-----
From: colorsync-users-bounces+graxx=email@hidden [mailto:colorsync-users-bounces+graxx=email@hidden] On Behalf Of Martin Orpen
Sent: 28 février 2015 12:49
To: 'colorsync-users?lists.apple.com' List
Subject: Re: SWOPv2 is dead
> On 28 Feb 2015, at 16:57, Roger Breton <email@hidden> wrote:
>
> I remain convinced that Adobe would do everyone a service by adopting GRACoL as the new default CMYK color space in the next iteration of Photoshop.
Europeans already have a default — ISO Coated v2 (300) — which is well established as being safe and reliable when you’re uncertain about the destination device.
I had to rescue a US ad campaign recently that was totally destroyed by your suggested Photoshop default because It is *impossible* to separate images with saturated shadows using Photoshop and GRACoL.
Give it a try. Make some rich dark blue, purple and red swatches in RGB and see them fade to grey in GRACoL.
When the clients complain, send them to my shop where Photoshop is never used for CMYK ;-)
--
Martin Orpen
Idea Digital Imaging Ltd
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden