• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Proofing Husky Opaque (Uncoated sheet)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Proofing Husky Opaque (Uncoated sheet)


  • Subject: Proofing Husky Opaque (Uncoated sheet)
  • From: Roger Breton <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2016 13:03:59 -0500

Been increasingly getting my feet wet into M0 vs M1 characterization.



Harvesting the data from the press sheets is a cinch, using the current crop
of M1 instruments such as with the Minolta FD-9.



But what about proofing? Does one really need a proofing substrate with a
"matching" white point?



Here, inspecting the measurements with PatchTool, Husky Opaque unprinted
paper yields 93.21  2.10  -8.53 using M0 and 93.53  2.30  -10.97 using M1.



Does it mean that I need to find a proofing substrate close to a b* =
-10.97? To have a fighting chance at an acceptable visual match?



Best / Roger

 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Proofing Husky Opaque (Uncoated sheet)
      • From: Claas Bickeböller <email@hidden>
  • Prev by Date: Re: Turn off color management!
  • Next by Date: Re: Turn off color management!
  • Previous by thread: Re: Mundane color problem
  • Next by thread: Re: Proofing Husky Opaque (Uncoated sheet)
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread