Re: Reading textile samples
Re: Reading textile samples
- Subject: Re: Reading textile samples
- From: Claas Bickeböller <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 18:13:26 +0100
> Am 10.03.2016 um 17:59 schrieb Ray Cheydleur <email@hidden>:
>
> If so, you'll need a spectrometer with carefully-chosen geometry. If not, anything will do.
>
>> Sorry, disagree. When measuring textiles (or any other textured and/or uneven material) the shadows produced by a single-angle illumination are the biggest issue.
> ——
> Like so many things there is an element of truth in both positions…
>
> There are a number of fairly smooth inkjet fabrics that can be color managed quite well with either a large aperture 0:45 or 45:0 device or with a device in scanning mode where the “virtual aperture” combined with suitably larger patches solves the same issue.
The more „paper-like“ (=smooth surface, though paper isn’t perfectly smooth either) a substrate is, the less problems you have with 45°:0° or 0°:45°, agree.
>
> Class is correct though that at some point changing geometry is the best answer – though I’d hardly say the “biggest issue”.
> Like many non-paper substrates when you move to other substrates each comes with a host of challenges of which measurement geometry is only one of many.
Ok, let’s not make it too rigorous which issue is the biggest. We agree that for any sample and application there are more and less appropriate choices with different pro’s and con’s.
I think the baseline was understood.
Claas
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden