Re: Epson canned profiles
Re: Epson canned profiles
- Subject: Re: Epson canned profiles
- From: ben <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2018 20:19:25 -0700
On Apr 14, 2018, at 3:09 PM, Andrew Rodney <email@hidden> wrote:
> On Apr 14, 2018, at 12:21 PM, ben <email@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> If Epson has finally solved that problem, good on them.
>
> What problem?
The problem that started the thread: needing a different profile for different
printer settings (resolution, etc.) for the same paper.
But back up a moment. Are you _really_ trying to tell us that, for example,
Dmax is the same whether you choose economy ink-sipping mode or full-resolution
soak-the-paper mode? If so, what's the point of the different modes? Or do
users no longer have such options?
> Provide us some dE values for differences in the same package when moving
> said sliders with a RelCol intent.
Wha...?
If your profiling engine has parameters that you can adjust that don't actually
change the output, what's the point of the parameters?
And if you're just using off-the-shelf consumer-level hardware with the bundled
software and its default values...why would the printer manufacturer need to
hire you to do anything?
(Incidentally, Argyll's profiling engine lets you choose all sorts of things
that can dramatically and potentially very usefully change the results, even
with colorimetric intents. There's the standard observer for starters. For
relative colorimetric, how quickly are you bending the neutral axis to paper
white and Dmax? Gamma / shaper / LUT? If LUT, what color space? FWA?
Illuminant? Observing conditions? Gamut mapping?)
Cheers,
b&
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden