Re: PSO Coated v3 separations
Re: PSO Coated v3 separations
- Subject: Re: PSO Coated v3 separations
- From: Martin Orpen <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2018 22:50:30 +0100
On 22 Aug 2018, at 20:32, Mike Strickler <email@hidden> wrote:
>
> The good news is that the blame can be placed on the customer who specs the
> paper.
No consolation when you’ve got the image maker, who often isn’t the client,
crying in the viewing booth :(
This is a real problem when clients are used to you being able to pull
problematic images, fix them up and replace them seamlessly and economically in
most jobs.
With 51 you have to reject all the images and then hand out a fact sheet on how
they have to shift to perceptual (even if it looks different in Photoshop) and,
even then, it still won’t boost the yellows (or reduce the magenta in our case)
in the same way that non-Photoshop workflows do.
--
Martin Orpen
Idea Digital Imaging Ltd
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden