PSO Coated v3 separations
PSO Coated v3 separations
- Subject: PSO Coated v3 separations
- From: Mike Strickler <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2018 12:52:13 -0700
>
> No consolation when you’ve got the image maker, who often isn’t the client,
> crying in the viewing booth :(
>
> This is a real problem when clients are used to you being able to pull
> problematic images, fix them up and replace them seamlessly and economically
> in most jobs.
>
> With 51 you have to reject all the images and then hand out a fact sheet on
> how they have to shift to perceptual (even if it looks different in
> Photoshop) and, even then, it still won’t boost the yellows (or reduce the
> magenta in our case) in the same way that non-Photoshop workflows do.
>
I know, but is this really any different from all the other difficulties
customers presented you with before this? What happened when they converted to
ISO Uncoated or an IFRA news profile and posterized some colors by using rel
col instead of perceptual? Why not ask them to use the older ISO Ctd v2 and you
take it the rest of the way—and ask for original RGB images when they have
them? And get or make some decent device links with better highlight scaling?
Mike
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden