Re: PSO Coated v3 separations
Re: PSO Coated v3 separations
- Subject: Re: PSO Coated v3 separations
- From: Martin Orpen <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2018 09:58:06 +0100
> On 24 Aug 2018, at 07:12, Claas Bickeböller <email@hidden> wrote:
>
> if I remember the discussion about FOGRA52 the conclusion was:
>
> There are gamut mapping algorithms out there which give decent results using
> the new characterization data.
> It’s just that they are not inside the profilers you have currently access to.
>
> Correct?
>
> So why don’t you simply buy a decent profiler, create a profile with a
> mapping that you prefer and give these profiles to your clients?
As much as I’d love to completely replace our software every time a new
standard is published, the way things were left here was with X-Rite admitting
that i1Profiler could not produce a viable profile from the 52 data and that
the fix would require them rewriting code in their Prism colour engine — so
don’t hold your breath…
FYI: we don’t supply profiles to clients. They are using the ECI profile in
Photoshop and we are having to fix the problems that this causes. In 39 we
could fix and send images back to them without any issues. We cannot do that
with 51 and 52 because the differences between Photoshop and products like
GMG’s ColorServer are so very different.
--
Martin Orpen
Idea Digital Imaging Ltd
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden