RE: PSO Coated v3 separations
RE: PSO Coated v3 separations
- Subject: RE: PSO Coated v3 separations
- From: email@hidden
- Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2018 08:44:53 -0400
Martin,
Would using a different profiler help with the soft proofing issue, by any
chance?
Have you had the chance to try this on the BVDM images?
At least, that would give you the beginning of a solution, regardless of your
main policy...
What about an Argyll profile?
Best / Roger
-----Original Message-----
From: colorsync-users
<colorsync-users-bounces+graxx=email@hidden> On Behalf Of Claas
Bickeböller
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2018 2:12 AM
To: 'colorsync-users?lists.apple.com' List <email@hidden>
Subject: Re: PSO Coated v3 separations
Martin,
if I remember the discussion about FOGRA52 the conclusion was:
There are gamut mapping algorithms out there which give decent results using
the new characterization data.
It’s just that they are not inside the profilers you have currently access to.
Correct?
So why don’t you simply buy a decent profiler, create a profile with a mapping
that you prefer and give these profiles to your clients?
My 2 cents
Claas
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden