Re: Canon imagePROGRAF PRO-1000
Re: Canon imagePROGRAF PRO-1000
- Subject: Re: Canon imagePROGRAF PRO-1000
- From: Anthony R Sanna <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2018 12:38:41 -0600
> On Mar 5, 2018, at 7:49 AM, Pappas George <email@hidden> wrote:
>
> I started using Imageprint several years ago and came to appreciate it for
> better print quality and color management predictability given
> Apple/Epson/Adobe constantly messing with subtle changes that disrupt color
> management.
I gave up on ImagePrint after using for many generations of the software. I
started testing IP after I ran into situations where it couldn’t print areas of
saturated color. The first instance that got me started was the side of a
building that was a deep saturated blue on my Eizo that IP printed as black.
As I went back through my prints I found other areas of saturated color that IP
couldn’t render on my 3880 that I just overlooked at the time.
When I started to compare the 3D gamuts of profiles in ColorThink (IP’s,
custom, and canned) I couldn’t believe the difference. The IP gamuts were very
limited - tiny, in fact - when compared with either custom or canned profiles
for the Epson - even, if I’m remembering correctly, smaller than sRGB or CMYK
gamuts I looked at. I’d post a picture of a CT IP gamut, but shortly
thereafter I ditched the software and it’s profiles.
Tony
-
Anthony Sanna
(608) 206-3134
email@hidden <mailto:email@hidden>
www.tonysanna.com
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden