Re: Humans (and cameras and scanners) do not have a color gamut (?)
Re: Humans (and cameras and scanners) do not have a color gamut (?)
- Subject: Re: Humans (and cameras and scanners) do not have a color gamut (?)
- From: Henry Davis via colorsync-users <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2020 17:16:32 -0500
Thanks Roger. What I don’t understand is the idea that the visible spectrum as
I understand it has some sort of gamut - it has defined ends. That seems like
a gamut to me.
Henry Davis
> On Jan 7, 2020, at 4:55 PM, Roger Breton via colorsync-users
> <email@hidden> wrote:
>
> Henry,
>
> I'm not a digital camera designer but what don't you understand about the
> fact that a camera is a sophisticated "light detection system"? It's pretty
> much a color measuring instrument (others could correct me) but an i1pro does
> not have a "gamut" per se or a filter-based colorimeter, they take light in
> and spit out numbers in response -- same with digital cameras, they take
> light in and spit out sets of RGB numbers. Surely there's a lot of math going
> on inside the CPU of a Nikon or a Canon or a SONY camera, like estimation of
> scene illuminant by which tonal responses are likely adjusted. There may very
> well be some kind of "model" of various 'natural scenes' because, just like
> during the creation of output profiles, it helps to have some kind of
> "assumptions" as to what ranges of colors or luminances are to be expected.
> But is that a"gamut" per se? A gamut is a physical construct, it comes from
> something measurable that have "limits".
>
> I hope that helps...
>
> / Roger
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden