RE: Humans (and cameras and scanners) do not have a color gamut (?)
RE: Humans (and cameras and scanners) do not have a color gamut (?)
- Subject: RE: Humans (and cameras and scanners) do not have a color gamut (?)
- From: Roger Breton via colorsync-users <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2020 17:30:39 -0500
Henry,
By "design", they can't have bounds, right? So, yeah, they all have their
secret sauces to break the world of luminances down to RGB numbers. They don't
have gamuts -- believe what you want.
/ Roger
-----Original Message-----
From: colorsync-users
<colorsync-users-bounces+graxx=email@hidden> On Behalf Of Henry
Davis via colorsync-users
Sent: Tuesday, January 7, 2020 5:28 PM
To: email@hidden
Subject: Re: Humans (and cameras and scanners) do not have a color gamut (?)
Thanks for helping but I’m struggling with how a camera can have no bounds.
If different cameras have different responses it seems to me that one of them
or both must be limited. Either that or they just have different ways of
assigning numbers to the same bucket of input values.
Henry Davis
> On Jan 7, 2020, at 5:18 PM, Roger Breton via colorsync-users
> <email@hidden> wrote:
>
> Henry,
>
> I agree, the visible spectrum has a (physical) "limit" but not the camera? No
> two cameras are likely to have the same response to the spectrum locus. The
> limit, in this case, is in the "object" being captured -- not in the camera
> itself.
>
> Do you see the difference?
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden