Re: Humans (and cameras and scanners) do not have a color gamut (?)
Re: Humans (and cameras and scanners) do not have a color gamut (?)
- Subject: Re: Humans (and cameras and scanners) do not have a color gamut (?)
- From: Wire ~ via colorsync-users <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 15:10:18 -0800
Andrew, so I am watching your sRGB tutorial on the web, and in this video
you remark, and I quote
"If your camera is set up to give you sRGB, then that's what you're gonna
get"
So what's the finer point here? If we placed your tutorial next to your
diatribes on this thread, which definition should we choose?
On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 2:53 PM Wire ~ <email@hidden> wrote:
> I'm probably mis-remembering. Ah, I recall, you stacked the IT8 on the
> printed patches.
>
> So sry, nevermind!
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 2:48 PM Wire ~ <email@hidden> wrote:
>
>> Yes, MonacoEZColor! That's it
>>
>> So what made a world-renowned color company think they could offer
>> consumer inkjet printer profiling this way?
>>
>> And it worked for me well enough to allow custom ink and paper combos
>> that looks way better than default, even if they might be imperfect by all
>> kinds of measures.
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 2:38 PM Andrew Rodney via colorsync-users <
>> email@hidden> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> > On Jan 10, 2020, at 3:27 PM, Wire ~ via colorsync-users <
>>> email@hidden> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Per this "where does the gamut not live" convo...
>>>
>>> Must you?
>>>
>>> > Back in the bronze age of consumer color I had a Monaco package that
>>> made
>>> > printer and scanner profiles.
>>>
>>> MonacoEZ? Whatever, scanner based printer profiles? No, it didn’t work
>>> worth a damn making printer profiles.
>>> Back in days even before that, at least there were actual tools like the
>>> ColorTron (still have one) that could.
>>>
>>> > Why can an unprofiled scanner be used to make a printer profile,
>>>
>>> No.
>>>
>>> > yet it's common to create and use a IT8- ot Q60-referenced scanner
>>> profile for photographic scans?
>>>
>>> What makes you assume an un-profiled scanner can make a printer profile
>>> that’s useable? Have you ever tried to make a decent paper profile with a
>>> scanner as some here have?
>>> Tried the same thing with a recent version of SliverFast? I have, also a
>>> printer profile created. Useless but created.
>>>
>>> Do you own a Spectrophotometer? Want a printer profile, use that; right
>>> tool for the right job.
>>>
>>> Andrew Rodney
>>> http://www.digitaldog.net/ <http://www.digitaldog.net/>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>>> colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
>>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>>>
>>>
>>> This email sent to email@hidden
>>>
>>
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden