• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Human color vision
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Human color vision


  • Subject: Re: Human color vision
  • From: Andrew Rodney via colorsync-users <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2020 17:41:56 -0700

On Jan 14, 2020, at 3:25 PM, Martin Orpen via colorsync-users
<email@hidden> wrote:
>
> 
>> On 14 Jan 2020, at 21:48, Andreas Kraushaar via colorsync-users
>> <email@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> Studying at RIT I learned that there are two "schools": One is in favour of
>> the idea to attribute an input device with a colour volume and the other
>> isn't.
>
> A  second school who dares to disagree with Andrew’s “facts”?
>
> How could that be possible?

What you’ve failed to understand is these are not “my” facts. I’ve provided
facts from a large number of actual color scientists; from Munsell, RIT, etc.
The question you should be asking yourself but can’t is; how can YOU disagree
with the facts from so many experts in the field of color?
I'm sorry that these facts continue to ruin your life.
 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

References: 
 >Re: Human color vision (From: Martin Orpen via colorsync-users <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: RE: Humans (and cameras and scanners) do not have a color gamut (?)
  • Next by Date: Re: Human color vision
  • Previous by thread: Re: Human color vision
  • Next by thread: Re: Human color vision
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread