• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Human color vision
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Human color vision


  • Subject: Re: Human color vision
  • From: Martin Orpen via colorsync-users <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2020 22:25:33 +0000

> On 14 Jan 2020, at 21:48, Andreas Kraushaar via colorsync-users
> <email@hidden> wrote:
>
> Studying at RIT I learned that there are two "schools": One is in favour of
> the idea to attribute an input device with a colour volume and the other
> isn't.


A  second school who dares to disagree with Andrew’s “facts”?

How could that be possible?

Perhaps it’s a geographic thing? The majority of papers I’ve seen on
calculating input device gamuts are from the UK or Mainland Europe.

—
Martin Orpen
Idea Digital Imaging Ltd

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
colorsync-users mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Human color vision
      • From: Andrew Rodney via colorsync-users <email@hidden>
References: 
 >RE: Human color vision (From: Roger Breton via colorsync-users <email@hidden>)
 >AW: Human color vision (From: Andreas Kraushaar via colorsync-users <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Humans (and cameras and scanners) do not have a color gamut (?)
  • Next by Date: Re: Human color vision
  • Previous by thread: AW: Human color vision
  • Next by thread: Re: Human color vision
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread