Re: Humans (and cameras and scanners) do not have a color gamut (?)
Re: Humans (and cameras and scanners) do not have a color gamut (?)
- Subject: Re: Humans (and cameras and scanners) do not have a color gamut (?)
- From: Andrew Rodney via colorsync-users <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2020 15:20:28 -0700
> On Jan 14, 2020, at 2:25 PM, Wire ~ via colorsync-users
> <email@hidden> wrote:
>
> Will the real ICC sRGB please stand up!
> https://ninedegreesbelow.com/photography/srgb-profile-comparison.html
For some here (and I know I speak for Iliah who I’ve seen share this blog
piece), nothing new. Nor is it a new concept that people call things that are
not what they really are (sRGB in this case). There really is one true sRGB as
defined so long ago and whenever anyone differs from the spec, but calls it
sRGB, it really isn’t.
BTW, that group with “color“ in it’s name you’ve made some entertaining if not
inaccurate comments about have this specification of sRGB:
http://www.color.org/chardata/rgb/srgb.xalter
And you can find Michael’s original 1996 spec’s here:
https://www.w3.org/Graphics/Color/sRGB.html
<https://www.w3.org/Graphics/Color/sRGB.html>
Not that ANY of this has anything to do with Humans (and cameras and scanners)
do not have a color gamut....
Andrew Rodney
http://www.digitaldog.net/ <http://www.digitaldog.net/>
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden