Re: Humans (and cameras and scanners) do not have a color gamut (?)
Re: Humans (and cameras and scanners) do not have a color gamut (?)
- Subject: Re: Humans (and cameras and scanners) do not have a color gamut (?)
- From: Andrew Rodney via colorsync-users <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 20:54:09 -0700
> Couldn’t Google it then?
No need.
> A hint would be that these are real-world colour scientists who developed a
> very well known colour management system and encoding solution.
>
> Not Fairchild (and his facility) making theoretical declarations about the
> strict limitations of input devices.
That it isn’t him, doesn’t alter what he and other’s who agree with him have
clearly stated you refuse to accept.
> He’s no help when it comes to making an image is he?
Do you know about making images?
Old joke: A proctologist is a guy sitting on a stool, looking at stools.
Newer joke: A photo retoucher is a guy sitting on a stool, looking at
photographers images he didn’t make.
> But Marc and Graeme and Wire (and anybody else) who realises that those input
> devices can play multiple roles are useful to us.
“We” realize imput devices often play multiple roles. Doesn’t alter what a
significant group of color scientists have stated about their lack of a color
gamut.
> We need to hear more from them and a lot less from you.
“We“ again. You’ve ignored the writings of Fairchild, faculty at RIT plus
Plaisted, plus Holm and Walowit among others.
Andrew Rodney
http://www.digitaldog.net/ <http://www.digitaldog.net/>
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
colorsync-users mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden