Re: SOT: performance
Re: SOT: performance
- Subject: Re: SOT: performance
- From: Marc Poirier <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 21:46:59 +0100 (CET)
>
Just a quick question... my TiBook 550 / 256, OS X 10.2, is proving to be
>
unacceptably slow building AU with ProjectBuilder, and feels very laggy in
>
general (compared to the same machine running Classic and building VST
>
plugins [yes, I know VST is simpler than AU],
APIs aside, I'm also guessing that you're comparing building VST with CW
and building AU with PB. I think that the bigger issue is the compiler.
PB (or more specifically, gcc) builds WAAAY more slowly than CW. I love a
lot of things about PB and gcc, but definitely my big gripe (and I'm
certainly not alone) is speed of compiling.
>
Anyone working with a machine of this sort of spec? I'm wondering if an
>
extra 256M ram is going to make all the difference or whether I should
>
start saving up for a new Powerbook (or even a Dual G4 desktop) already :-(
Does it have 256 now? Mac OS X likes to use a lot of memory, and I used
to use it with only 256 MB of RAM. When I upgraded to 512 MB, I felt a
big difference. :) So I would recommend at least 512 MB...
Marc
_______________________________________________
coreaudio-api mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/coreaudio-api
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.