Re: SOT: performance
Re: SOT: performance
- Subject: Re: SOT: performance
- From: john <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 20:35:03 +0000
Hi Angus,
I would guess compiling something the size of an average AU shouldn't
take a long time. CW seems to be faster at compiling, but I don't know
if it's just faster or if it's also not as efficient.
On another note, I found enabling altivec makes PB take enormously long.
Hard drive speed is also somewhat of an issue. RAM helps as well, as
Marc pointed out. You shouldn't need a new computer yet, but Apple does
appear to be doing more dual-processor optimizations to things in
addition to altivec.
-- John
Hi all,
Just a quick question... my TiBook 550 / 256, OS X 10.2, is proving to
be
unacceptably slow building AU with ProjectBuilder, and feels very
laggy in
general (compared to the same machine running Classic and building VST
plugins [yes, I know VST is simpler than AU], or the similar-specced
Wintel
laptop it shares desk space with [which can build a much more complex
DirectX plug in half the time]).
Anyone working with a machine of this sort of spec? I'm wondering if an
extra 256M ram is going to make all the difference or whether I should
start saving up for a new Powerbook (or even a Dual G4 desktop)
already :-(
Regards,
Angus.
_______________________________________________
coreaudio-api mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/coreaudio-api
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.