• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: AU interface consistency
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: AU interface consistency


  • Subject: Re: AU interface consistency
  • From: Urs Heckmann <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 10:42:40 +0200

Am Mittwoch, 02.10.02, um 05:19 Uhr (Europe/Berlin) schrieb Herbie Robinson:

Now I'm tired and get some sleep. I follow this later, if not everybody is bored by this.

Cheers,

;) Urs

We're definitely not bored...

I take your word for it :D


I think the points everyone is making are pointing at a client/server architecture with multiple clients (and maybe more than one server, too).

The server would be an audio processing engine. The clients would handle the user interface.

One processing engine would support multiple clients simultaneously controlling the same session. Clients could look like a typical DAW program or could be hardware controllers... Or they could be something totally new. This would also allow the development of task specific clients (like a tracking controller or an editing controller) that all play in the same game plan.

This kind of client server architecture can also allow more than one person to work on the same session using multiple workstations (something that can be done with a large console, but that can't be done on a DAW).


Hmm, this is a very general description and I think it is meets the point very precisely. Nice!

Of course, the server has a set of standard clients (if you say client == user interface) and the basic topic of this thread, AudioUnits, are additions to the server (virtual hosts rather than mods in Apache talk?) which typically can either be provided a UI by the host software (aufx only) or feature its own (auvw + aufx) or both.

However, after having had a short and yet not sufficient amount of sleep, I found a word that I was looking for leading me to give a further statement:

Customizing user interfaces doesn't necessarily contradict with consistency.

Having different look and feels in one environment can obviously provide advantages (Thank you Jim, for supporting my statement).

Cheers,

;) Urs
_______________________________________________
coreaudio-api mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/coreaudio-api
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

References: 
 >Re: AU interface consistency (From: Herbie Robinson <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: AU interface consistency
  • Next by Date: Re: AU interface consistency
  • Previous by thread: Re: AU interface consistency
  • Next by thread: Re: AU interface consistency
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread