Re: AU MIDI events scheduled beyond next rendering slice
Re: AU MIDI events scheduled beyond next rendering slice
- Subject: Re: AU MIDI events scheduled beyond next rendering slice
- From: Urs Heckmann <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 22:49:34 +0200
Am Donnerstag, 07.08.03, um 20:10 Uhr (Europe/Berlin) schrieb Bill
Stewart:
I think you are trying to solve a hard problem, but in the wrong place.
ok
My objections hadn't been for cpu usage though (wasn't there something
called G5?). - If a plug knew about a voice stealing situation in
advance, it would be clever to fade out that voice quickly to avoid
annoying clicks. My kids do some pretty heavy stuff now for this case,
just because they don't know it in advance, and they don't like to
render clicks 8-)
He, if a host sends them a CPU load order, they'll fight back with a
NULL pointer 8-)
I prefer to let the user decide which quality he likes... (and they do
also, if I interpret some forum postings right)
We do *not* expect that AU's are given scheduling information beyond
the next buffer.
ok - makes stuff easier. But then again, for which buffer is it when
non-thread safe stuff interrupts the process or vice versa?!? - If you
say no here, you should say no there 8-)
Cheers,
;) Urs
(don't take too seriously...)
_______________________________________________
coreaudio-api mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/coreaudio-api
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.