Re: Is ReWire necessary under OS X?
Re: Is ReWire necessary under OS X?
- Subject: Re: Is ReWire necessary under OS X?
- From: Robert Grant <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2003 18:03:16 -0500
My recollection is that they spoof the CoreAudio.framework and thus
intercept the
calls before passing them on to the real framework.
Robert.
On Sunday, February 2, 2003, at 05:20 PM, Chris Reed wrote:
On Sunday, Feb 2, 2003, at 02:43 US/Central, Urs Heckmann wrote:
Am Sonntag, 02.02.03, um 00:36 Uhr (Europe/Berlin) schrieb Chris Reed:
the copyright concern/drm problems were because users wanted the
ability to capture the audio output from any application, even if it
was not directly supported.
Uh-hu, I always wonder what the philosophical difference between
digital connection inside 1 computer is vs. digital connection across
two computers or just plugging 2 cables (analogue cables were
commonly used last millenium to transfer sound from one device to
another).
Sometimes I've got the impression that the pop industry tries
everything to prevent musicians from making music. They seem to act
like a snake that eats up its own tail.
Just an opinion.
However, I think Hijack works like a Debugger in the way that it
launches applications from within its own process to get access
across application boundaries. Could be I'm wrong, though.
some time ago, Kurt Revis (i think) sent a description of how Audio
Hijack most likely works to this list. i don't remember the subject
title, but it should be fairly easy to find in the archives.
cheers
-chris
_______________________________________________
coreaudio-api mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/coreaudio-api
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
_______________________________________________
coreaudio-api mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/coreaudio-api
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.