• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
RE: MIDI "Controller" Support (was: Rationale for ignoring common MIDI control changes)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: MIDI "Controller" Support (was: Rationale for ignoring common MIDI control changes)


  • Subject: RE: MIDI "Controller" Support (was: Rationale for ignoring common MIDI control changes)
  • From: "MMA \(Tom White\)" <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 14:40:40 -0700

Data Entry is required for devices compliant with GM and DLS. It
is used to set the Pitch Bend Sensitivity and Fine/Course Tuning.

- Tom White, MMA

> -----Original Message-----
> From: email@hidden
> [mailto:email@hidden]On Behalf Of phil c
> Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2003 7:24 AM
> To: CoreAudio API
> Subject: Re: MIDI "Controller" Support (was: Rationale for ignoring
> common MIDI control changes)
>
>
> Quite a few of the controllers in your list are rarely supported.
> Sustenudo, Soft, Legato, Hold2, etc.. Data Entry, Filter
> resonance, the
> vibrato controllers are also very rare. It's been a fairly long time
> since I have seen these implemented or been asked to
> implement them on
> hardware designs.
>
> phil
> On Friday, July 11, 2003, at 04:55 PM, Bill Stewart wrote:
>
> > There is a list of controls that all "GM compatible" synths are
> > generally required to support. I think a similar regime should be
> > imposed on software synths for a degree of consistency that
> has served
> > the users of hardware synths rather well. Some controls may
> not make
> > sense of course, but many/most do...
> >
> > For those interested here's the list:
> >
> > - MIDI Controllers
> > // These have an LSB as well (in brackets)
> > BankSelect = 0, (32)
> > ModWheel = 1, (33)
> > Breath = 2, (34)
> > Foot = 4, (36)
> > PortamentoTime = 5, (37)
> > DataEntry = 6, (38)
> > Volume = 7, (39)
> > Balance = 8, (40)
> > Pan = 10, (42)
> > Expression = 11, (43)
> >
> > // these controls have a (0-63) == off,
> (64-127) == on (no LSB)
> > Sustain = 64, //hold1
> > Portamento = 65,
> > Sostenuto = 66,
> > Soft = 67,
> > LegatoPedal = 68,
> > Hold2Pedal = 69,
> > FilterResonance = 71,
> > ReleaseTime = 72,
> > AttackTime = 73,
> > Brightness = 74,
> > DecayTime = 75,
> > VibratoRate = 76,
> > VibratoDepth = 77,
> > VibratoDelay = 78,
> >
> > // these controls have a 0 < 128 range (no LSB)
> > ReverbLevel = 91,
> > ChorusLevel = 93,
> >
> > AllSoundOff = 120,
> > ResetAllControllers = 121,
> > AllNotesOff = 123,
> >
> > // these control ID's have a range of 0 < 128
> > RPN_PitchBendSenstivity
> > RPN_ChannelFineTune
> > RPN_ChannelCourseTune
> > RPN_ModDepthRange
> >
> > - Pitch Bend
> > - Channel Aftertouch
> > - Program Change
> >
> > As we've already discussed, the support for Program and
> Bank Select
> > messages are not required if the synth is a preset based synth -
> > essentially a mono-timbral synth in most cases, thus the
> host services
> > will generally provide a way to map a Patch/Bank to a preset
> > selection... I've left off Polyphonic Aftertouch, as no-one
> has seemed
> > that interested in supporting this...
> >
> > I put this list together from a GM spec that is available
> for perusal
> > at the MMA (MIDI Manufacturer's Association) web site
> > (http://www.midi.org/)
> >
> > Obviously, many of these are not particularly interesting
> for alot of
> > synths - if I were asked to say which ones I think are important:
> > Volume
> > Pan
> > Mod Wheel
> > Foot Controller
> > Sustain
> > AllSoundOff
> > ResetAllControllers
> > AllNotesOff
> > Pitch Bend (and its nice to have the RPN support for
> setting the range
> > for that as well)
> > After Touch
> >
> > Doug/Chris may have some additional comments as well..
> >
> > Bill
> >
> > On Friday, July 11, 2003, at 12:42 PM, Robert Grant wrote:
> >
> >> I'm working on a bigger and better Rax-like host and I'm
> trying to
> >> provide a MIDI mixer to handle the Pan/Balance issue as
> well as allow
> >> level setting for both internal and external synths from a single
> >> point. But it seems that many AU synths are ignoring
> Channel Volume
> >> and some are ignoring Pan.
> >>
> >> Is there any reason to ignore Channel Volume when most external
> >> synths will honor it? And what about Pan/Balance?
> >>
> >> Thanks for the enlightenment...
> >>
> >> Robert.
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> coreaudio-api mailing list | email@hidden
> >> Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
> >> http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/coreaudio-api
> >> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> >>
> >>
> > -- mailto:email@hidden
> > tel: +1 408 974 4056
> >
> >
> ______________________________________________________________
> _________
> > ___
> > "Much human ingenuity has gone into finding the ultimate Before.
> > The current state of knowledge can be summarized thus:
> > In the beginning, there was nothing, which exploded" -
> Terry Pratchett
> >
> ______________________________________________________________
> _________
> > ___
> > _______________________________________________
> > coreaudio-api mailing list | email@hidden
> > Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
> > http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/coreaudio-api
> > Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> _______________________________________________
> coreaudio-api mailing list | email@hidden
> Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/coreaudio-api
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
_______________________________________________
coreaudio-api mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/coreaudio-api
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

References: 
 >Re: MIDI "Controller" Support (was: Rationale for ignoring common MIDI control changes) (From: phil c <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: MIDI "Controller" Support
  • Next by Date: Re: Audio Units and sending Midi
  • Previous by thread: Re: MIDI "Controller" Support (was: Rationale for ignoring common MIDI control changes)
  • Next by thread: Re: MIDI "Controller" Support (was: Rationale for ignoring common MIDI control changes)
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread