Re: MIDI "Controller" Support (was: Rationale for ignoring common
Re: MIDI "Controller" Support (was: Rationale for ignoring common
- Subject: Re: MIDI "Controller" Support (was: Rationale for ignoring common
- From: Glenn Olander <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 15:15:49 -0700
<facetious>
:-) hmmm, where is this planet where, because all hosts implement
that mapping, synth developers do not need to? It must be the
same planet where AU is the only platform which synth developers must
support, and where Logic supports multiple outs for AU's.
</facetious>
I'm sorry, I couldn't resist :-), but sometimes on this list
it feels like Apple is on that planet and the rest of us are
not.
- Glenn
Chris Rogers wrote:
I completely agree with you that MIDI learn is much more powerful
than MIDI implementation charts. However, I'm not sure it's necessary
for each MusicDevice to have to implement it. The hosting application
can effectively implement this soft-mapping feature without any
extra work on the part of the soft-synth developer....
_______________________________________________
coreaudio-api mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/coreaudio-api
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.