• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Mixer units
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Mixer units


  • Subject: Re: Mixer units
  • From: Bill Stewart <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 12:46:15 -0800

Neither of our 2 current mixers are using the AUEffectBase - that's really intended for the basis of in-process-out...

I understand this is a big hole - but we are plugging it...

bill

On Thursday, March 13, 2003, at 12:30 PM, Robert Grant wrote:

Hi Bill,

Sorry if it seems that I've been whining - but the mixer discussion did seem a bit one sided for a while ;-). I'm sure you guys are very busy.

And now you've made me very curious about the missing piece you've alluded to...

Meanwhile I'm trying to educate myself a bit - but perhaps with this missing piece you're hinting maybe I should wait? - and build a simple mixer just to get my hands dirty.

The first question I've got is: Shouldn't I be using an AUKernel to do the little bit of DSP on the input busses to the mixer? But AUKernels seem to be associated with AUEffects (it's in AUEffectBase,h) Is that just a bit of housekeeping or is there something that tightly couples AUKernels to AUEffects?

Thanks,

Robert.

On Thursday, March 13, 2003, at 03:22 PM, Bill Stewart wrote:

Firstly

We have heard you loud and clear about the shortcomings of the AUs in the Mixer space and are planning on addressing this... I'd recommend for those that want to know more about our upcoming "features" to attend WWDC this year:)

Secondly - I completely understand the concept of what a hardware mixer is - but you should bare in mind that a hw mixer is a rather complex collection of components... So the analogy in Software is that a "Mixer" is a collection of components... From the user's point of view if I'm using a SW emulation of a Mixer (like Logic, Cubase, etc...) we've become accustomed to seeing not only these features that are seen in hardware mixers, but also the ability to load thousands of plugins (inserts)... But remember, these AREN'T just one piece of code (or even from one vendor - or EVEN from vendors that even know about each other!!!)

So writing software, you are in the business of putting components together to present complex functionality... So, what does this mean for a Mixer Unit? It means that (with some pieces that we missed previously that we'll talk about at WWDC) you are NOT going to get a Mixer Unit that just does all these things with half a dozen function calls.... But what it does mean is that the primary piece that *IS* missing - well we'll address that!

Bill

On Tuesday, March 11, 2003, at 06:59 PM, Robert Grant wrote:

Hi Bob,

Thanks for your input. Makes a lot of sense and I just checked the specs of an Analog mixer I was fantasizing about before I saw "Reason" :-) The Soundcraft Spirit M-Series is a well regarded contemporary mixer with mono and stereo inputs. The Mono inputs feature a Pan control and the stereo inputs feature a Balance control. Sounds perfect to me. Of course the effects sends and returns would be nice too. :-)

http://www.soundcraft.com/products/spirit_mseries_home.htm

Can anyone provide an example mixer AU project? Please.....

Robert.

On Tuesday, March 11, 2003, at 09:27 PM, Bob Camp wrote:

Hi,

A lot of this comes down to having a model that people are comfortable with. The longer it takes to figure out the presentation the worse the user experience. Frustration is not a good thing.

When I sit down with a good old analog mixer I expect to have:

1) Pan pots - both for stereo and mono sources
2) Trim pots on each input
3) Mute and solo switches
4) Basic tone adjust
5) Aux sends and returns

If that stuff isn't there on my shiny new mixer I'm going to wonder what I spent my money on.

I think the same thing applies to the software equivalent of the box. A quick look at any number of analog boxes will give you a feature set that they pretty much all have. Each feature cost them something to put in there. None of them came for free. They put them in there because that's what people needed and used. When they left them out people complained or bought another brand.

The software "toolkit" probably will have the same sort of market that the analog mixer did. It's a building block that more or less does the same thing. You use it to as part of a setup. In the end they should look a lot alike.

Enjoy!

Bob Camp


On Tuesday, March 11, 2003, at 08:23 PM, Robert Grant wrote:

My problem is that a hosting app should provide a nice place for mixing the output. If the mixer can't pan or balance stereo sources then we should have a way of getting mono output from every music device. I can't imagine attempting to do a mix by leaping to 20 different stereo devices and fiddling with each of their individual pan controls on 20 different custom GUIs. Does that sound practical to anyone else? As an example many Reason users take the individual outs from the ReDrum and route them into the ReMix even though the redrum has a stereo output and pan controls for each drum sound because the ReMix gives them better and more consistent control.
_______________________________________________
coreaudio-api mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/coreaudio-api
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
_______________________________________________
coreaudio-api mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/coreaudio-api
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.


-- mailto:email@hidden
tel: +1 408 974 4056

______________________________________________________________________ ____
"Much human ingenuity has gone into finding the ultimate Before.
The current state of knowledge can be summarized thus:
In the beginning, there was nothing, which exploded" - Terry Pratchett
______________________________________________________________________ ____



--
mailto:email@hidden
tel: +1 408 974 4056

________________________________________________________________________ __
"Much human ingenuity has gone into finding the ultimate Before.
The current state of knowledge can be summarized thus:
In the beginning, there was nothing, which exploded" - Terry Pratchett
________________________________________________________________________ __
_______________________________________________
coreaudio-api mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/coreaudio-api
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
References: 
 >Re: Mixer units (From: Robert Grant <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Thoughts about streaming from disk and VM
  • Next by Date: Re: Callbacks with MusicPlayer
  • Previous by thread: Re: Mixer units
  • Next by thread: Re: Mixer units
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread