Re: Lost cycles - VST vs. AU
Re: Lost cycles - VST vs. AU
- Subject: Re: Lost cycles - VST vs. AU
- From: Pavol Markovic <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 10:15:41 +0200
There's some performance loss when using Mach-O ABI without some
optimizing:
http://www.unsanity.org/archives/000044.php
PM
On 18.6.2004, at 9:40, Mike Janney wrote:
The VST is Carbon. I did the measurements without the GUI open.
Mike
Is your VST CFM Carbon plugin or Mach-O bundle?
On 17.6.2004, at 8:46, email@hidden wrote:
Hello
I am porting our VST 'Bass Line' to Audio Units and the AU seems to
be
eating a bit more time, tho its using the exact same processing code.
The
VST takes 17% cpu and the AU about 25% (measured with top). In RAX
this
shows up as an extra click in the cpu measurement for the AU. I
already
checked that the compiler flags are set the same. Any ideas?
Thanks,
Mike Janney
www.audiorealism.se
_______________________________________________
coreaudio-api mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/coreaudio-api
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
_______________________________________________
coreaudio-api mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/coreaudio-api
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.