• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Lost cycles - VST vs. AU
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Lost cycles - VST vs. AU

  • Subject: Re: Lost cycles - VST vs. AU
  • From: Pavol Markovic <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 09:36:05 +0200
Is your VST CFM Carbon plugin or Mach-O bundle?

On 17.6.2004, at 8:46, email@hidden wrote:

Hello
I am porting our VST 'Bass Line' to Audio Units and the AU seems to be
eating a bit more time, tho its using the exact same processing code. The
VST takes 17% cpu and the AU about 25% (measured with top). In RAX this
shows up as an extra click in the cpu measurement for the AU. I already
checked that the compiler flags are set the same. Any ideas?

Thanks,
Mike Janney
www.audiorealism.se
_______________________________________________
coreaudio-api mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/coreaudio-api
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
_______________________________________________
coreaudio-api mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/coreaudio-api
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

References: 
 >Lost cycles - VST vs. AU (From: email@hidden)

  • Prev by Date: Re: validate StreamFormat
  • Next by Date: Re: ChannelMap and SampleRate change weirdness
  • Previous by thread: Re: Lost cycles - VST vs. AU
  • Next by thread: Re: Lost cycles - VST vs. AU
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread