• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: RME & latency discussion
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: RME & latency discussion


  • Subject: Re: RME & latency discussion
  • From: Herbie Robinson <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 16:29:46 -0400

On Oct 13, 2004, at 2:55 AM, William Stewart wrote:

Great explanations. They give an accurate picture.


Is this good enough? Remember, sound takes 1msec to travel a foot, so the latency for you to hear my guitar playing if you are 20 feet away from my speaker is 20msecs, an orchestra has at least 50msecs of latency from side to side...etc..., enough for one day I think.

>From what I've read here and there and from my personal experience the latency "problem" is not relevant for people listening to the music but for the musician doing self-monitoring. After all, a couple of ms is within an acceptable delay range for most of us (if not all of us). However, some singers have been reporting "phase" problems between sound coming from their throat and sound coming from the output of the DAW. When the instrument produces sharp attack (e.g. a hard strike on a guitar string) then you've got a disturbing impression of uncorrelated sound and hand movement. I'm perfectly aware that going under the 64 samples buffer size is risky and therefore maybe that musicians should accept that self-monitoring using DAWs has some limitations and cannot completely replace the direct monitoring.


Philippe

I have had situations where performers were annoyed with the latency in Pro Tools TDM. This is especially true when monitoring vocals via headphones, because you get phase cancelation in the air cavities in your head. it's not even conclusive that less latency is even better (unless you can make it zero latency). Sometimes a long delay actually helps!


The ONLY way to deal with monitoring in a way that will keep anybody happy is to use an analog mixer for the monitoring.
--
-*****************************************
** http://www.curbside-recording.com/ **
******************************************
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Coreaudio-api mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden
  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: RME & latency discussion
      • From: Dennis Gunn <email@hidden>
References: 
 >I/O Latency (Was: Layman with a mission) (From: William Stewart <email@hidden>)
 >Re: I/O Latency (Was: Layman with a mission) (From: Philippe Wicker <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Find out all IOProcs attached to an Audio device in a Process
  • Next by Date: Re: Safety Offset (Was: I/O Latency (Was: Layman with a mission))
  • Previous by thread: Re: I/O Latency (Was: Layman with a mission)
  • Next by thread: Re: RME & latency discussion
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread