Re: RME & latency discussion
Re: RME & latency discussion
- Subject: Re: RME & latency discussion
- From: Dennis Gunn <email@hidden>
- Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 00:09:56 +0900
On Oct 15, 2004, at 5:29 AM, Herbie Robinson wrote:
I have had situations where performers were annoyed with the latency
in Pro Tools TDM. This is especially true when monitoring vocals via
headphones, because you get phase cancelation in the air cavities in
your head. it's not even conclusive that less latency is even better
(unless you can make it zero latency). Sometimes a long delay
actually helps!
I hear what you are saying in a hypothetical kind of way but in my
experience the lower latency the better with vocalists every time,
increasing the latency is not an acceptable way to deal with the phase
cancelation because by the time you completely get rid of the phase
problem you have an annoyingly perceptible delay
The ONLY way to deal with monitoring in a way that will keep anybody
happy is to use an analog mixer for the monitoring.
I guess you me "everybody" but, that way is no good either. The market
is moving relentlessly toward plugin processing and there are things I
use on live inputs that I don't think are even available analog
devices.
The way to make DAW users happy is to get the latency right.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Coreaudio-api mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden