Re: RME & latency discussion
Re: RME & latency discussion
- Subject: Re: RME & latency discussion
- From: John Stiles <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 08:29:22 -0700
On Oct 15, 2004, at 8:09 AM, Dennis Gunn wrote:
The ONLY way to deal with monitoring in a way that will keep anybody
happy is to use an analog mixer for the monitoring.
I guess you me "everybody" but, that way is no good either. The
market is moving relentlessly toward plugin processing and there are
things I use on live inputs that I don't think are even available
analog devices.
The way to make DAW users happy is to get the latency right.
By "right," do you really mean "zero" here? Don't hold your breath--the
digital path will always have some latency. It may be down to a handful
of samples for each connection, but it will never go away entirely, no
matter how fast computers get and how smart the software engineers are.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Coreaudio-api mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden