Re: USB vs. FireWire
Re: USB vs. FireWire
- Subject: Re: USB vs. FireWire
- From: Markus Medau <email@hidden>
- Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2005 03:39:13 +0200
Hi Thane,
> One concern we have is for maintaining our clock. Would we have more
> jitter on USB than FireWire?
You can use what is called "asyncronous" audio, meaning having no link
between USB clock and masterclock/samplerate to get around this. That's
basically what we are doing with our USB developments.
BTW, if someone at Apple could look into my bug report ID4105986 from
May, 3rd 2005 (status open) regarding Mac OS X native support on async
USB Audio that would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Markus
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Coreaudio-api mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden