Lists

Terms and Conditions
Lists hosted on this site
Email the Postmaster
Tips for posting to public mailing lists

Re: XCode 2.4 and 32/64-bit universal binaries

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: XCode 2.4 and 32/64-bit universal binaries

Subject: Re: XCode 2.4 and 32/64-bit universal binaries
From: Artemiy Pavlov <email@hidden>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 16:52:33 +0300

Floating-point registers are the same size despite of CPU is 32-bit or 64-bit. Even ancient 8087 FPU had 80-bit floating-point registers, although 8086 was a 16-bit CPU


Yes, my mistake, apologies.

It is integer calculation which could benefit from 32-bit to 64-bit transition.

Okay, so, what about a 32-bit app on a 64 bit CPU vs. the same app compiled for that target 64-bit CPU? Will the latter work faster or no?


Thanks,


Artemiy.

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Coreaudio-api mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


Follow-Ups:

Re: XCode 2.4 and 32/64-bit universal binaries
From: Herbie Robinson <email@hidden>
Re: XCode 2.4 and 32/64-bit universal binaries
From: Rustam Muginov <email@hidden>


References:  
  >XCode 2.4 and 32/64-bit universal binaries (From: Artemiy Pavlov <email@hidden>)
  >Re: XCode 2.4 and 32/64-bit universal binaries (From: Marc Van Olmen <email@hidden>)
  >Re: XCode 2.4 and 32/64-bit universal binaries (From: Artemiy Pavlov <email@hidden>)
  >Re: XCode 2.4 and 32/64-bit universal binaries (From: Rustam Muginov <email@hidden>)




Prev by Date:
Re: XCode 2.4 and 32/64-bit universal binaries

Next by Date:
Re: XCode 2.4 and 32/64-bit universal binaries

Previous by thread:
Re: XCode 2.4 and 32/64-bit universal binaries

Next by thread:
Re: XCode 2.4 and 32/64-bit universal binaries

Index(es):

Date
Thread