• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: WireTap, CoreAudio's API, and system capture, and kexts...
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: WireTap, CoreAudio's API, and system capture, and kexts...


  • Subject: Re: WireTap, CoreAudio's API, and system capture, and kexts...
  • From: Dan Nigrin <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 14:40:16 -0500

My assumption was that Andy might be able to handle some of the complexity you describe within his app, shielding the end user from it -- not sure if that's possible, but something to explore.

Dan

At 11:29 AM -0500 1/18/06, Andy O'Meara wrote:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but there's a bigger issue at hand...  No user will
be very interested in fiddling with their current audio settings just to
make an eye-candy app visualize the system sound.  In other words, it's my
understanding that JackOS needs to install a (virtual) audio device where
something like iTunes gets routed to it (by setting the system's sound
output to this virtual device)--very similar to how Soundflower works.
Unfortunately, whitebelt users won't be up for this, and I would have to
agree with them.  A whitebelt user would (rightly) feel in over his head the
moment he's told to set the sound output device in the system prefs to an
item that doesn't physically exist.

Andy



On 1/18/06 11:17 AM, "Daniel Jalkut" <email@hidden> wrote:

Interesting project. What is your view on how (if at all) this could be used or distributed by a commercial application, without violating the spirit of
the GPL as you're using it?


 Daniel

 On Jan 18, 2006, at 9:50 AM, Dan Nigrin wrote:


Andy, sorry for my late entry into this discussion -- in case you've not explored it yet, don't forget to look at Jack OS X; it's also open source, and you may be able to extend it enough to work for your application. It works differently than Soundflower.





 http://www.jackosx.com




_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Coreaudio-api mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden


--
Dan Nigrin
Defective Records
202 Hack / PC-1600 User / VSTi Host / OMS Convert / Jack OS X
http://www.defectiverecords.com
http://www.jackosx.com


_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Coreaudio-api mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
References: 
 >Re: WireTap, CoreAudio's API, and system capture, and kexts... (From: "Andy O'Meara" <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: WireTap, CoreAudio's API, and system capture, and kexts...
  • Next by Date: Re: MOTU 896 vs. MOTU 896HD
  • Previous by thread: Re: WireTap, CoreAudio's API, and system capture, and kexts...
  • Next by thread: Re: WireTap, CoreAudio's API, and system capture, and kexts...
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread