• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: aux tracks and audio units
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: aux tracks and audio units


  • Subject: Re: aux tracks and audio units
  • From: Nik Reiman <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 23:43:59 +0100

Presently, it's just a regular effect. Apparently it works in DP, so I imagine that it shows up as a regular insert. Does the AU spec have anything about special inserts or anything of the sort?

-Nik

Am 30.01.2006 um 23:38 schrieb William Stewart:

I'm not entirely sure either. What AU type is your AU now? Does it show up normally in the inserts menu of DP tracks?

Bill

On 29/01/2006, at 6:52 AM, Nik Reiman wrote:

Recently, a user of one of my plugins asked me to implement it as an "aux track" plugin so it would work correctly within digital performer. I've never used DP, so I'm not exactly sure what needs to be done to my plugin to make it work with this type of send. When I asked for clarification, he wrote:

"An aux track is a special type of audio track that routes an input directly
to an output. It's used as an individual signal path within DPs mixer. It's
simply a routing mechanism, but doesn't allow recording into itself. It
does, however, have all the same inserts, etc as an audio track.
I use an aux track to bring in virtual instruments from another computer
into DP so I can mix everything, including hardware synths or virtual
instruments all within the DP mixing board. Example: an electric piano on my
second mac coming out of it's audio interface into the interface on the main
(sequencing-DP) Mac and routed through an aux track, right alongside all my
actual audio tracks with audio info on them, making that elec piano aux
track behave exactly like the audio track residing right next to it, but
with it's own efx, inserts, etc."


I understand what he's looking for, but have no idea how to acutally do it short of not implementing a kernel or ProcessBufferLists, which I don't think will work. How do I make my AU compatible with this type of send?

Thanks,
-Nik

--
Nik Reiman :: email@hidden
Teragon Audio :: http://www.teragon.org
Custom audio software design


_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Coreaudio-api mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
40apple.com


This email sent to email@hidden

--
mailto:email@hidden
tel: +1 408 974 4056
______________________________________________________________________ ____
"Much human ingenuity has gone into finding the ultimate Before.
The current state of knowledge can be summarized thus:
In the beginning, there was nothing, which exploded" - Terry Pratchett
______________________________________________________________________ ____




-- Nik Reiman :: email@hidden Teragon Audio :: http://www.teragon.org Custom audio software design


_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Coreaudio-api mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: aux tracks and audio units
      • From: William Stewart <email@hidden>
References: 
 >aux tracks and audio units (From: Nik Reiman <email@hidden>)
 >Re: aux tracks and audio units (From: William Stewart <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: aux tracks and audio units
  • Next by Date: Libao audiounit port
  • Previous by thread: Re: aux tracks and audio units
  • Next by thread: Re: aux tracks and audio units
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread