Re: OT: Apple has a patent on tremolo!
Re: OT: Apple has a patent on tremolo!
- Subject: Re: OT: Apple has a patent on tremolo!
- From: Jeff Evans <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 10:11:58 -0800
? Seems to me that what Kurzweil is talking about is merely that they
offer a chance to specify the Hertz of a pitch instead of using a
named pitch predefined by equal temperament. This would allow one to
affect the beat rate produced by harmonic combinations, tuning for
example a major third so that it was beatless, as in "just" intonation.
It could also be used, true, to create an artificial tremolo by
slightly detuning two waves of the same nominal pitch, but the
process is not automatic as it is in the patent. The patent covers an
automatic method, simple as it is, of making an artificial tremolo
constant over a wide pitch range.
But that doesn't mean I believe the the patent office actually looks
at these applications.
Jeff Evans
On Mar 2, 2007, at 1:26 AM, Richard Dobson wrote:
Ben Cox wrote:
On Mar 1, 2007, at 12:39 PM, Paul Evenblij wrote:
But this is not about sine waves. In my understanding,
the patented method is a way of getting beat
frequencies which are constant along a large range of
main frequencies. I.e. if you have your two
oscillators playing C3, and the beat frequency is 3
Hz, then if you play C4, the beat frequency will be 6
Hz using 'prior art'. Using Apple's method, this beat
frequency will *always" be 3 Hz.
True. But there are still decades of prior art on this one.
People have been doing this with modular synths for a long time,
and many non-modular synths allow you to use fixed-beat type
modulation instead of fixed-ratio.
Unless this patent application was filed a long time ago, or has
lots of other claims in it besides this apparently simple
concept, it sounds hinky to me.
-- Ben
Prior art: this is from the Kurzweil KN2000 manual (around 1992
vintage):
"There’s only one parameter on this control input page that may
still be unfamiliar to you: Fine Hz. We discussed this in Chapter
6. It can tune the pitch of the waveform in terms of its actual
frequency in Hertz, as opposed to the usual method of tuning by key
names. The advantage to
using the Fine Hz parameter is that you can maintain constant beat
frequencies across much of the keyboard when you have a program
with slightly detuned multiple layers (or multiple waveforms in one
layer).
"
The net effect of course is still indistinguishable from tremolo,
such that this form of detuning can be said to be a way to get
tremolo, in practice probably fairly subtle, not up to the 100% mod
that real AM could give you.
Thanks again to the Sherlocks on the Csound list for finding this
example.
Richard Dobson
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Coreaudio-api mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
nova.com
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Coreaudio-api mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden