Re: SubGraphs
Re: SubGraphs
- Subject: Re: SubGraphs
- From: Jens Alfke <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 08:49:00 -0800
On Feb 22, 2009, at 10:55 PM, Russ Fellman wrote:
I was reading some of the posts on SubGraphs but the youngest I
could find was 2006. I would like to make a mixer that would be able
to have effects placed anywhere along the signal path in the main
graph and be dynamically controlled. Is this possible?
I may be misunderstanding, but you don't need to use subgraphs to do
this. Just create graph nodes for all the audio units (inputs,
outputs, effects, mixers) and tell the graph how to connect their
inputs and outputs together.
I haven't used subgraphs, but my understanding is that they're just a
way to hide complexity by encapsulating an entire graph as a single
node so you can easily use it in other graphs. But you can always do
the same thing using a single graph.
In your case it sounds like you want a graph such as
track 1 --> effect A --> effect B --> ... \
track 2 --> effect C --> effect D --> ... --Mixer --> Output
track 3 --> effect E --> effect F --> ... /
I do basically this in the audio app I'm working on, just without the
effects (for now...) The only tricky part is feeding the audio files
into the graph. There is a standard audio unit that will play audio
from a file region, but it doesn't work for offline (non-realtime)
usage so I can't use it in my app unfortunately.
—Jens
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Coreaudio-api mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
| References: | |
| | >SubGraphs (From: Russ Fellman <email@hidden>) |