Re: View >> AU communication
Re: View >> AU communication
- Subject: Re: View >> AU communication
- From: Olivier Tristan <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 01:30:56 +0200
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 1:16 AM, Brian Willoughby<email@hidden> wrote:
>
> On Sep 3, 2009, at 16:07, Olivier Tristan wrote:
>>
>> Problem is, it gives headaches for complex plugin.
>> I wonder why Logic Nodes do not run the whole plugin on the distant
>> system while the UI is displayed
>> on the main system using some export display like X or VNC.
>
> The reason is because X or VNC use several times the bandwidth compared to
> just sending the parameter and property updates. You would be able to
> achieve less with Logic Nodes if X or VNC were used.
>
>> Any ideas ?
>
> Complex plugins are always a headache. Why not just do this the right way?
> Is there a specific reason why you cannot use the recommended property
> changes, even in a complex plugin?
>
I would say for the same reason Apple didn't do it for the EXS24 or
UltraBeat (please correct me If I'm wrong)
Regarding Bill answer, xserve doesn't have graphic card ?
--
Olivier Tristan
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Coreaudio-api mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden