• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Audio Units and OpenCL?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Audio Units and OpenCL?


  • Subject: Re: Audio Units and OpenCL?
  • From: Richard Dobson <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 19:05:46 +0100

James McCartney wrote:

Almost all research in the parallel/multiprocessing/concurrency communities is about maximizing throughput and utilization and there is not even very much awareness of real time issues like minimizing or bounding latency except among the real-time financial folks.


Ironic, one way and another!


So most
known architectures and techniques that are published in the literature are not going to be beneficial for audio. As to awareness within Apple of these issues, we in CoreAudio and in some other media groups are aware and are always doing what we can to make others groups aware: fast is not real time. slow is not necessarily not real time. fast enough with reliable bounds on latency is real time.



There was a panel at SC'08 on HPC for audio (I think mainly from the Berkeley Labs folk); I have no idea of how that went, or if anyone, so to speak, took note. The real irony I think is that the requirements you described for HPC audio (or as I have called it, "HiPAC") if properly followed up in research, commercial or academic, would surely be of benefit to the wider HPC community generally (and as we know, Apple already has mileage in the HPC community). My own modest attempts at getting academic research funding in the UK have failed because (all other factors aside) in the grand scheme of things it is an unimportant topic.

But Apple is in a unique position in this respect given it has in principle full control over both hardware and software, and has an obvious interest in supporting audio. We clearly need some kind of heterogeneous computing solution to give us both serial and parallel power with tight deadlines. Such as an audio equivalent to the GPU, tightly coupled with the rest of the chipset. That must have attractions for those financial folk at the very least. I had hoped that OpenCL + Snow Leopard were going to be pretty close to that, but seemingly not. Next year I expect to see 16-core machines. OS X 'Cheetah' perhaps?

Richard Dobson





_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Coreaudio-api mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Audio Units and OpenCL?
      • From: James McCartney <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Audio Units and OpenCL? (From: Mike Lemmon <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Audio Units and OpenCL? (From: Jean-Daniel Dupas <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Audio Units and OpenCL? (From: Markus Fritze <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Audio Units and OpenCL? (From: Richard Dobson <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Audio Units and OpenCL? (From: James McCartney <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Audio Units and OpenCL?
  • Next by Date: Re: Audio Units and OpenCL?
  • Previous by thread: Re: Audio Units and OpenCL?
  • Next by thread: Re: Audio Units and OpenCL?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread