• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Audio Units and OpenCL?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Audio Units and OpenCL?


  • Subject: Re: Audio Units and OpenCL?
  • From: Richard Dobson <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 18:30:41 +0100

Stephen Blinkhorn wrote:
..
Perhaps OpenCL is more useful for things like a convolution reverb where you can offload the processing required to update the impulse whilst the user edits some parameters. Things like that?


Already done - but using CUDA. See: http://www.liquidsonics.com/software.htm

The point about convolution reverb (as with FFT processes generally) is that these algorithms are "embarrassingly parallel" - in essence, large-scale matrix multiplications with 100s or 1000s done simultaneously. GPU coding should give massive speedups; but we need those tight deadlines (and high-bandwidth bus transfers) as well.


Richard Dobson

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Coreaudio-api mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


References: 
 >Audio Units and OpenCL? (From: Mike Lemmon <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Audio Units and OpenCL? (From: Jean-Daniel Dupas <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Audio Units and OpenCL? (From: Markus Fritze <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Audio Units and OpenCL? (From: Richard Dobson <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Audio Units and OpenCL? (From: Stephen Blinkhorn <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Audio Units and OpenCL?
  • Next by Date: Re: Audio Units and OpenCL?
  • Previous by thread: Re: Audio Units and OpenCL?
  • Next by thread: Re: Audio Units and OpenCL?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread