Re: long double data type
Re: long double data type
- Subject: Re: long double data type
- From: Luigi Castelli <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 10:44:44 -0700 (PDT)
Hi there,
this is the second time that I get a similar response:
> Are you sure that your DSP approach is sound?
>
> If 64bits are not enough there is probably something wrong
> with your algorithm.
I really don't want to sound arrogant because it is not what I am about, however I ASSURE you that I performed all the necessary tests, both mathematical and auditive to corroborate my conclusion. My approach is sound, I just don't have enough bits for the audio quality I am after. I understand it might sound weird to hear that 64 bits are not enough.
I might have reached the upper limit of the current technology, but doubting my approach is not helping. I would ask advice on the approach if I wasn't sure it was the right one.
I would love to get back on track with the questions I have asked.
I apologize in advance if I offended somebody. It was not my intention.
Thank you for your understanding.
- Luigi
--- On Tue, 6/15/10, tahome izwah <email@hidden> wrote:
> From: tahome izwah <email@hidden>
> Subject: Re: long double data type
> To: email@hidden
> Date: Tuesday, June 15, 2010, 8:33 AM
> I know that I am not really
> contributing, but...
>
> > (Yes, I did my tests and 64 bits of precision just
> doesn't cut it)
>
> Are you sure that your DSP approach is sound?
>
> If 64bits are not enough there is probably something wrong
> with your algorithm.
>
> Just my 2 centibits
> --th
> _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be
> ignored.
> Coreaudio-api mailing list (email@hidden)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
> This email sent to email@hidden
>
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Coreaudio-api mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden