Re: auol and DAWs
Re: auol and DAWs
- Subject: Re: auol and DAWs
- From: Paul Davis <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 20:57:10 -0400
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 8:51 PM, Brian Willoughby <email@hidden> wrote:
> But you are right about one thing: If you find a host which has the features
> you want - processing an entire track through an effects chain and writing
> the new data to a new track - then an 'auol' is the right way for you to
> implement the processing you want, provided you understand that the reading
> and writing of data will be handled by the AU host.
of course, there is the slight problem that most 'aufx' plugins can
also support this mode of operation. should their authors label them
as 'aufx' or 'auol'? should a host pay any attention at all to this
classification?
--p
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Coreaudio-api mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden