Re: auol and DAWs
Re: auol and DAWs
- Subject: Re: auol and DAWs
- From: William Stewart <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 19:13:13 -0700
aufx
There is a property that a host should set (_OfflineRender) when an effect is being used in an offline mode. For some effects (and instruments) this makes a big difference and should be used.
On Mar 30, 2010, at 5:57 PM, Paul Davis wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 8:51 PM, Brian Willoughby <email@hidden> wrote:
>> But you are right about one thing: If you find a host which has the features
>> you want - processing an entire track through an effects chain and writing
>> the new data to a new track - then an 'auol' is the right way for you to
>> implement the processing you want, provided you understand that the reading
>> and writing of data will be handled by the AU host.
>
> of course, there is the slight problem that most 'aufx' plugins can
> also support this mode of operation. should their authors label them
> as 'aufx' or 'auol'? should a host pay any attention at all to this
> classification?
>
> --p
> _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Coreaudio-api mailing list (email@hidden)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
> This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Coreaudio-api mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden