Apple

Well stack trace 0 is malloc so I disagree. That and the fact that is possible to tell as I am sure Jeff M. knows.

Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 10:10 PM

Subject: Re: dynamic allocation in the CoreAudio DSP thread

It's impossible to tell, really: `operator new` here could be overridden to use something other than `malloc`.

On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 5:45 PM, Taylor Holliday <email@hidden> wrote:

Hi CoreAudio,

While making sure my DSP code isn't doing any dynamic allocation, I noticed that HALObject seems to be doing it... am I misunderstanding the following stack trace?

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/45540223/Audulus/DynamicAlloc.tiff

thanks!

- Taylor

W. Taylor Holliday, Owner/Founder
Subatomic Software, San Francisco

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Coreaudio-api mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
email@hidden

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Coreaudio-api mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your email sent to email@hidden

References:
	>dynamic allocation in the CoreAudio DSP thread (From: Taylor Holliday <email@hidden>)
	>Re: dynamic allocation in the CoreAudio DSP thread (From: Art Gillespie <email@hidden>)