Well stack trace 0 is malloc so I disagree. That and the fact that is possible to tell as I am sure Jeff M. knows. From: Art Gillespie Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 10:10 PM To: Taylor Holliday Cc: email@hidden Subject: Re: dynamic allocation in the CoreAudio DSP thread It's impossible to tell, really: `operator new` here could be overridden to use something other than `malloc`. On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 5:45 PM, Taylor Holliday <email@hidden> wrote: Hi CoreAudio, While making sure my DSP code isn't doing any dynamic allocation, I noticed that HALObject seems to be doing it... am I misunderstanding the following stack trace? https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/45540223/Audulus/DynamicAlloc.tiff thanks! - Taylor W. Taylor Holliday, Owner/FounderSubatomic Software, San Francisco _______________________________________________Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.Coreaudio-api mailing list (email@hidden)Help/Unsubscribe/Update email sent to email@hidden _______________________________________________Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.Coreaudio-api mailing list (email@hidden)Help/Unsubscribe/Update your email sent to email@hidden
Hi CoreAudio, While making sure my DSP code isn't doing any dynamic allocation, I noticed that HALObject seems to be doing it... am I misunderstanding the following stack trace? https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/45540223/Audulus/DynamicAlloc.tiff thanks! - Taylor W. Taylor Holliday, Owner/FounderSubatomic Software, San Francisco _______________________________________________Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.Coreaudio-api mailing list (email@hidden)Help/Unsubscribe/Update email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Coreaudio-api mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden