Lists

Terms and Conditions
Lists hosted on this site
Email the Postmaster
Tips for posting to public mailing lists

Re: Replacing launchd

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Replacing launchd

Subject: Re: Replacing launchd
From: Dave Zarzycki <email@hidden>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 13:39:21 -0700

Full is the operative word.

It'll work, but it won't be full. I doubt you'll notice the difference though.

davez

On Sep 29, 2005, at 11:57 AM, Graham J Lee wrote:

Hi,
I've been playing with launchd and have compiled a new version (it can veto jobs if the system's running off a battery). Obviously I've had to build it from the Darwin source, so I've had to #ifdef out a chunk of code...see http://release.opendarwin.org/release/ 8.2.1/Sources/launchd-106-darwin.patch

The question is, before I hose either of my machines, could a launchd with that patch above applied actually boot a full Tiger? Has anyone tried it?
Thanks,
Graham.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


Follow-Ups:

Re: Replacing launchd
From: Jason Townsend <email@hidden>


References:  
  >Replacing launchd (From: Graham J Lee <email@hidden>)




Prev by Date:
FLICK IDL compiler..

Next by Date:
Re: Replacing launchd

Previous by thread:
Replacing launchd

Next by thread:
Re: Replacing launchd

Index(es):

Date
Thread