Re: Replacing launchd
Re: Replacing launchd
- Subject: Re: Replacing launchd
- From: Jason Townsend <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 13:57:23 -0700
On Sep 29, 2005, at 1:39 PM, Dave Zarzycki wrote:
Full is the operative word.
It'll work, but it won't be full. I doubt you'll notice the
difference though.
davez
On Sep 29, 2005, at 11:57 AM, Graham J Lee wrote:
Hi,
I've been playing with launchd and have compiled a new version (it
can veto jobs if the system's running off a battery). Obviously
I've had to build it from the Darwin source, so I've had to #ifdef
out a chunk of code...see http://release.opendarwin.org/release/
8.2.1/Sources/launchd-106-darwin.patch
The question is, before I hose either of my machines, could a
launchd with that patch above applied actually boot a full Tiger?
Has anyone tried it?
You may want to not apply the first part of that patch if you intend
to browse /Network in the Finder at all.
-Jason
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden