Re: StartupItems
Re: StartupItems
- Subject: Re: StartupItems
- From: Michael Smith <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 21:59:47 -0700
On Jun 2, 2006, at 12:04 PM, email@hidden (Peter Seebach) wrote:
I just don't think it's a good tool for the very early
bootstrapping phase
of system startup, because there's a lot of existing programs that
need some
kind of dependency-checking functionality provided externally.
From a design
standpoint, I'm not even sure they're wrong; that seems like the
kind of code
that's tricky enough that we shouldn't have to have fifty separate
implementations.
I still don't understand where you think that all this code that has
to be added to applications to "check dependencies" comes from.
But at any rate, the first assertion you make here is manifestly
nonsense; the system is largely bootstrapped (and will be more
largely bootstrapped as time goes on) by launchd.
= Mike
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden