Re: Read-Timeout with Blocking Socket
Re: Read-Timeout with Blocking Socket
- Subject: Re: Read-Timeout with Blocking Socket
- From: Colin Hirsch <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 14:23:03 +0100
On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 04:51:38PM -0600, Marc Epard wrote:
> Call select with a timeout, then, depending on what select returns,
> call read.
Select() is infinitely better than alarm or setitimer, but I would
recommund poll() rather than select(), if possible -- on most
systems it's faster, and I believe that it's also easier to use.
Regards, Colin
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden